 |
| Source: NPD SolarBuzz, SolarBuzz Quarterly. |
New survey-based data from SolarBuzz points very clearly to a very much needed ongoing adjustment to manufacturers planned module shipments. The chart above illustrates the issue very succinctly. In SolarBuzz´s survey conducted in Q2 of the current year, manufacturers were still planning on shipping just over 8 GW of modules in Q3 of this year and almost 9 GW in Q4. The somewhat obvious result was oversupply, a continued inventory build and falling module prices.
Recently, we have pointed to growing evidence that such a process is clearly at work:
- On the demand side, the rest of the world has been making up for slack demand out of Europe. In particular, the latest data points to blistering demand in the US – more detail here
- Likewise, China and Asia are showing extremely strong demand growth – see our article on the issue here
- And most importantly, on the supply side, the major Chinese players have drawn a halt to their excessively aggressive capacity expansion plans – more detail here. The data above of course simply highlights this new realism on the production and capacity side of the equation.
Taken together, these factors should allow the supply-demand imbalance currently facing the industry to be eroded as 2012 progresses. And of course, this new realism should eventually bring a better business environment. As Craig Stevens, President of NPD SolarBuzz states:
“While market share growth was the predominant corporate strategy at the beginning of the year, companies must now improve their financial viability, or they risk not being able to participate in the strong growth expected by grid parity now being established in key markets,”
Indeed, on the basis of the manufacturers survey from SolarBuzz, global module inventories are now expected to stand at 7.3 GW at the end of this year, not insignificant but certainly less than the survey´s previous indication of 8.6 GW.
‘Gross margins for vertically-integrated Chinese tier 1 cell and module manufacturers decreased two percentage points Q/Q in Q3’11, while Western and Japanese manufacturers dealt with negative margins for the second quarter in a row. Margins for Chinese tier 2 and other Asian producers tracked by NPD Solarbuzz are also negative now’.
In response to these pressures resulting from over-supply in the industry we had previously been recommending staying away from solar stocks until very recently. However, recently we decided to test the water with a basket of tier one Chinese players, for anyone willing to hold through what is likely to continue to be a volatile period.
So if you think this basket makes sense from a long term buy and hold perspective, why not buy and hold it?
Thanks for the question – and the opportunity to clarify our approach to this.
Simply put, no writer is obliged to trade any or all of his or her views. Some writers like to take an impartial position and never trade the stocks they write about.
Whatever the approach taken, the important point is that there is an obligation to fully disclose whether or not the writer has related positions. That is done at the bottom of each article.
Whenever I personally write an article, I may or may not put on a related position dependent on the level of risk I already have on the books at the time I have the idea and subsequently write about it.
Whatever I decide to do is then fully disclosed at the end of the article.